Physician review, not crowdsourcing alone
Qualified physicians enter final review; admission and pass rules follow the project agreement. The aim is traceable clinical judgment — not average clicks.
Data Engine · anchored on medicine
The Data Engine is anchored on the medical expert line: physician review, traceable QC materials, license terms on the contract and data card. The same method can extend to STEM, alignment and other high-gate tasks.
Qualified physicians enter final review; admission and pass rules follow the project agreement. The aim is traceable clinical judgment — not average clicks.
Secrecy-related and information-security controls follow valid certificates and their stated scope. Medical data handling uses internal de-id, authorization and least-privilege rules. What the contract does not cover does not enter the delivery set.
Provenance, protocol version, QC materials and review records as agreed. Confirm data-card fields before scaling volume.
CT/MRI/WSI labels to agreed QC thresholds with physician review.
Licensable de-id assets, structured index, commercial boundary (per data card).
Clinical preference, refusal policy and harmful medical-request red team (per scope).
Adjacent capacity: Olympiad-to-doctoral sets and solutions.
Adjacent capacity: expert preference, tool traces and eval environments.
Fine-grained vision–language for VLM needs beyond medicine.
Metric improvement (case study)
CT labels to agreed QC. Task, thresholds and metrics available after NDA. This site does not publish unaudited absolute efficacy claims.
Physician review · multi-year engagement
Named review records retained; license and boundary written into the SOW.
Traceable release materials
Private sets + physician scores; confirmed failure types feed the next training spec.
Adjacent capacity